![]() ![]() They also avoid the use of sharp scalpels or harsh preservative chemicals. Non-animal methods reduce the emotional, ethical, and religious barriers to education. A literature review conducted by the Society for Humane Science (SHS formerly Animals in Science Policy Institute) indicated that in 88 percent of studies, non-animal methods were superior or equivalent to dissection. Non-animal methods are not only more humane, but also more effective, more inclusive, safer, and more economical. More than 12 million animals, including frogs, cats, rats, fetal pigs, fish and a variety of invertebrates are used for dissection in the US each year. At a time when numerous interactive and immersive alternatives are available, it’s time to end this outdated practice once and for all by adopting non-animal teaching methods. Ending the Slaughter of Nonambulatory Pigs.State Wildlife Agency Contact Information.How to Communicate Effectively with Legislators. ![]() ![]() United States Legislative Information (external link).Preventing Animal Cruelty and Torture (PACT) Act.Farm Animal Anti-Confinement Legislation.Cetacean Anti-Captivity Legislation and Laws.Anti-whistleblower (“Ag-Gag”) Legislation.Traveling Exotic Animal and Public Safety Protection Act.Save America’s Forgotten Equines (SAFE) Act.Shaping Policy for Animals in Laboratories. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |